By Sheila Loftus October 2007
My friend Diane is smart. But even the smartest people in
the auto collision repair industry—and Diane is one of them—find it tough to
overcome this grim statistic: The average profit for body shops in the United
States is three percent.
How little is three percent?
My seven-year-old granddaughter is planning to open a bank
account with all the quarters, dimes, nickels, and pennies in her piggybank,
and that’s the kind of profit she’ll see after a year.
Fortunately, my granddaughter’s well-being doesn’t depend on
the interest her pennies earn.
Unfortunately, if you’re in the collision repair business,
your well-being does hinge on three percent.
Who is ensuring that body shops see only a three percent
profit?
Insurers, of course.
“Insurance companies demanded that we get in-house frame
machines,” says Diane, who owns a shop and has a Master of Management degree,
as well as degrees in nursing and economics. “Why? Because insurers could
control the cost.
“We spend upwards of $30,000 for a frame machine plus
$25,000 on a measuring system to work on the frame rack, add an extra bay to
put it in, and spend money to train a technician to work on it. Then what
happens? An insurance adjuster comes into the shop and says, ‘You don’t need
that much frame time.’”
In this scenario, there is a clear winner and a clear loser.
Winner: The insurance company, which has its insured’s work
done faster. “There isn’t as much payout for the rental car,” Diane says.
Loser: The body shop. “It used to be that we would sublet
the frame work and mark it up by 10 percent,” Diane says. “We were able to keep
the $55,000 we would have spent on a frame rack and a measuring system in the
bank at four percent interest.”
Diane says collision repairers were too naive to know that
the above scenario would cost them twice: once for the machine and again for
the short sheets the insurance carriers wrote for frame time.
“It has been an across the board loss for me,” Diane says.
“We have sold ourselves short.”
Shops would be cruel to look to increase their profit
margins by reducing what they pay their employees. Collision repair technicians
are already grossly underpaid.
“Why would a new technician want to come into this
profession when he can make $16 an hour working as a plumber?” Diane asks. “I
talked to one technician and he was making $10 an hour if you included the
benefits. His set rate was $9. That’s what happens when you keep the labor rate
low.”
Adds Diane: “When I started as a nurse in the ’70s, I was
making $6.75 an hour. My friend was a bodyman doubling his flat rate and making
$20 an hour. The nursing workforce was all female. They were underpaid. Betty
Friedan came out with her book (The Feminine Mystique), and women started making other choices. Suddenly
there was a nursing shortage. This is what is going to happen in the collision
repair industry. It is labor economics. These technicians have choices.”
Perhaps as troubling as the low pay body men receive is how
the financial constraints on shop owners limit how much training they can give
their employees.
“When you keep the labor rate artificially low,” Diane says,
“you don’t have any money to spend on training.”
A three-percent profit margin doesn’t exactly encourage a
shop owner to send a body man off to a weeklong, or even a weekend, training
course. And yet the complexity of today’s automobiles is such that continual
training is essential.
Are insurers willing to entrust their insureds’
state-of-the-art vehicles to technicians who haven’t updated their skill sets
in years?
“Our net profit is three percent,” Diane says. “This means,
you don’t train anyone and can’t buy equipment.”
How much longer before collision repair shops return to that
old standby—the tree in the front yard—to help with alignments?
It’s safe to say that a large number of collision repair
shop owners are in desperate financial circumstances. How desperate?
“I have to make a 45 percent profit on parts,” Diane says.
“Unless I make that, I can’t meet my overhead. When repairers give 10 percent
off on parts, they can’t pay for the overhead. What they have been doing is
stealing from the technicians to meet the shortfall.”
There is a difference between markup and profit, Diane says.
To get a 20 percent profit, a shop owner has to markup the item 25 percent.
In the short term, insurers are gobbling up huge amounts of
profit from collision repair shops. “Insurance companies sell a product that is
mandated by every state in the United States, but they cannot service this
product,” Diane says. “Remember: Insurance companies are for-profit entities.
Their goal is to add value to stockholders and not pay out on claims.”
In the long run, insurers risk leaving shop owners broke and
having body men flee to other industries.
And when that happens, who will fix the cars?
© 2007 Sheila’s Information Network Inc.
Sheila Loftus (sheilaloftus@yahoo.com),
past publisher of the CRASH Network, has written about the auto collision repair
industry for 32 years. She lives in Washington, D.C.
|